A few minutes ago these words arrived as a text message from my daughter. Found on Twitter, she wasn’t sure of author or origin.

“How about we treat every young man who wants to buy a gun like every woman who wants to get an abortion – mandatory 48 hour waiting period, parental permission, a note from his doctor proving he understands what he is about to do, a video he has to watch about the effects of gun violence, an ultrasound wand us his ass (just because). Lets close down all but one gun shop in every state and make him travel hundreds of miles , take time off work, and stay overnight in a strange town to get a gun. Make him walk through a gauntlet of people holding photos of loved ones shot to death, people who call him a murderer and beg him not to buy a gun.

It makes more sense to do this with men and guns, than women and health care. Right? I mean, no woman having an abortion has killed a room full of people in seconds. Right?”

Let The Abortion Issue Go

Since 1969 Canadian women have had access to legal abortions. Legalization originated with a bill introduced by then Justice Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau, amending Section 251 of the Criminal Code allowing abortions if a woman’s “health” was deemed “at risk”. The word “health” wasn’t defined or limited. The government wasn’t involved, approvals granted by a panel of three doctors. Abortions took place in accredited hospitals by a licensed doctor, all other abortions remained under the Criminal Code.

In 1988 the Supreme Court struck down Section 251 of the Criminal Code following a challenge brought by Henry Morgentaler. The court ruled law not applied equally across the country violated the “security of the person” guarantee under Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom – some hospitals didn’t form abortion committees, others approved all abortions, a few became known for unreasonably strict judgement. Only one of the seven Supreme Court Justices,  Madame Justice Bertha Wilson supported a woman’s right to abortion in the first trimester. Ultimately the court’s decision was based on procedural grounds. The court didn’t declare abortion a constitutional right, nor did it extend rights to a fetus.

In 1989 Prime Minister Mulroney introduced a bill restricting abortion to “health reasons only”, with a 2 year jail sentence for doctors who crossed the law. It passed the House of Commons, then fizzled into obscurity with a tie vote in the Senate. Since 1988, all Canadian woman have a right to legal abortion. Unrestricted up to the time of birth. In 2008 Dr. Henry Morgantaler was awarded the Order of Canada “for his commitment to increased health care options for women, his determined efforts to influence Canadian public policy and his leadership in humanist and civil liberties organizations.”

Why ponder abortion in Canada? A story out of Saskatchewan answers that question. With the Federal election in full swing, anti-abortion group CCBR (Canadian Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform) is going after Justin Trudeau. CCBR members first appeared on Saskatoon street-corners in June, offering pamphlets with graphic full colour images of aborted fetuses. Faster than Stephen Harper could call an election over the holiday weekend, CCBR members stuffed images of Justin Trudeau beside aborted fetuses into unsealed white envelopes, asking Canada Post to deliver “a vote for Trudeau is a vote for this” to unsuspecting households.

Julee Sanderson, head of the Canadian Postal Workers Union in Saskatoon voiced sentiments of horrified postal workers.

“They don’t want to be subjected to the public scrutiny by delivering a flyer that obviously is a political flyer made to shock people,” she added. “A lot of them feel as though Canada Post should not be engaging in this type of delivery.”

“We have keys to enter buildings, to put mail into mailboxes, or community mailboxes that other organizations or flyer delivery companies don’t have access to, and [receiving these kinds of flyers] is not a consumer’s choice,” said Sanderson.

Canada Post considers refusal to deliver mail serious misconduct, punishable with a 3-5 day suspension without pay. On Wednesday 4 letter carriers refused to deliver CCBR pamphlets. Their supervisor told them to go home, then changed his mind and said they could work today, Sanderson said.

Why can’t anti-abortion zealots let it go? Canada allowed freedom of choice 27 years ago, do they actually believe Canada willing to turn back time? Do they think abortion is a frivolous decision? Do they consider the fate of marginalized, unwanted children? Have they a clue about the state of Canada’s child welfare system?  Why should postal workers be forced to deliver graphic material to unsuspecting households when the issue is a done deal? What do they hope to gain by standing on soap boxes?

This is Canada. Canadians don’t force other Canadians to deliver graphic election propaganda against their will. CCBR pamphlets cross all boundaries of common sense and decency. Abortion is legal in Canada, and there are much bigger fish to fry.





Ponder Motion 312

Today Canada‘s House of Commons struck down Motion 312, aimed at re-opening the debate defining when life begins, by a vote of 203 to 91. Ponder the fact that 91 Members of Parliament voted in favour of the motion.

Abortions were illegal in Canada until Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau decriminalized them in 1969. Abortions were then allowed provided a committee of doctors ruled it was in the best interest of the mother. In 1988 R.V. Morgentaler  was the deciding case in which Canada’s Supreme Court struck down the 1969 law as unconstitutional. Since then there have been no laws to limit abortion in Canada. In Canada life “begins” when a foetus exits a mother’s womb.

Roe V. Wade seemingly settled the abortion debate in America. The 1973 Supreme Court decision effectively invalidated all state laws restricting a woman’s access to an abortion during her first trimester of pregnancy.

Most certainly beyond pondering, I’m astounded by this backward slide. The State of Arizona recently voted in a law defining the beginning of life as “calculated from the first day of the last menstrual period of the pregnant woman” in other words – before she is even pregnant.

A lot more attention should be paid to our governing bodies. If this isn’t a wake up call to ponder, I don’t know what is.